Ron Weasley: a major character in the Harry Potter series and one of the best friends of the hero. A favourite character of many people. But not mine. Not even close. I don’t really like Ron that much. He just seems so…useless. He’s a muppet. He abandons Harry twice. He has very little conscience. He’s immature. I don’t understand what Harry sees in him and I don’t understand what Hermione sees in him. I love Harry, Hermione, Ginny, Neville, Luna, Dumbledore, Hagrid and the rest, but I’ve always had a bit of a barrier to liking Ron.
So I did some research to try to answer the following questions:
1. What does Harry see in Ron that I don’t?
2. What does Hermione see in Ron that I don’t?
I started by googling ‘What does Harry see in Ron?’, which threw up nothing, and then ‘What does Hermione see in Ron?’, to see if other people had similar thoughts to me. A few quotes from this search:
“Just got through re-reading Order of the Phoenix and The Half-Blood Prince.
It's easy to see what he sees in her. Hermione's cute, has got brains, and loads of magical talent. Too much the goody-two-shoes know it all, true, but she's basically a good catch.
But all I see in Ron are three minorly admirable qualities: he's tall, funny and loyal. But Hermione never laughs at his jokes and his loyalty is mostly to his mate Harry.
Granted, the Weasley clan is a great plus: Ginny seems like she'd be a great sister-in-law, the twins are well on their way to riches with their magic shop, Charlie is dragon breeder and Bill is a banker, and even if Percy is a prat, having family in the Ministry of Magic is a dead useful contact. But she can still be Ron's friend and get to hang out with his family.
Basically, I don't get it. What gives with the Hermione/Ron attraction?
NO, I'm not jealous. I'm puzzled.”
“Anyway, what makes the relationship seem improbable to me is not the fact that Ron and Hermione bicker but just that I can't see what she sees in him. Hermione's a pretty good catch - after she fixed her teeth, it was apparent that she at very least cleaned up nice. And she's smart, capable, confident, and so forth - she's got a bright future ahead of her. Ron, on the other hand, simply doesn't bring as much to a relationship. He's not that smart. He's never described as particularly good-looking. And ninety percent of the time, during their adventures, he's sort of deadweight (except in the ridiculously contrived chess game in the first book, whose ending in general was pretty contrived.) Plus, he's got a real wussy side, as revealed in his performance as keeper.
Not like there's anything wrong with Ron, but Hermione seems to leap into most aspects of her life with a view towards improving herself and achieving. Most real high-achiever types like that that I've known generally have fairly high expectations for others. It's one thing to pal around with someone like Ron, but it just doesn't seem likely that Hermione would be satisfied with a guy who's frankly much less intelligent than she is and probably won't be doing nearly as much with his life. It just doesn't seem likely to me that Hermione would want someone who doesn't challenge her.”
“In general, ISTM that what women almost universally want in a man is one who is playing the lead role in his own life. He can do that confidently, humorously, heroically, tragically, or whatever, and different women have different preferences when one breaks it down like that. But few women are looking for the insecure guy who's always being pulled along in others' slipstreams because he doesn't know where he wants to go on his own, and the more self-assured the woman, the more unlikely that is.”
These quotes, especially the first, sum up what I was thinking.
Next, it was time to look at the books. I read through the series to find occasions where Ron is particularly likeable/honourable/a good friend and occasions where he is mean/negative/a bad friend.
In book one, Ron is generally a good friend to Harry and loyal to and protective of his family. He is initially rude to and about Hermione; once they become friends there are no particularly good or bad signs from him towards her.
In book two, things continue well for Ron – he sticks up for Harry and Hermione, reassures Harry, and shows bravery in following the spiders into the forest and going with Harry to the Chamber of Secrets.
In book three, he defends, encourages and reassures harry, and sticks up for Hagrid. At times he is a good friend towards Hermione, but he becomes nasty and malicious towards her over the Scabbers incident. He does, however, take the first step in making up with her.
In book four, Ron shows signs of being protective of Hermione and is generous to Dobby. Unfortunately, he also has a phase of rejecting Harry and not trusting him. He later apologises Harry and encourages him, but then has a row with Hermione, borne out of jealousy and mistrust and resulting in rudeness to and rejection of her. Overall, not a good book for Ron.
Book five is better for Ron – he shows loyalty to Harry, defends him and celebrates with him and sticks up for him. His friendship with Hermione has no particular highs or lows.
In book six, Ron is fairly pathetic with Fleur and Lavender, and spiteful to Hermione. His best moment is his promise to stick with Harry at the end of the book.
In the final book, Ron is protective of Hermione and Ginny. Of course, he becomes tetchier than the others when guarding the locket horcrux and eventually abandons them. On his return, he encourages and motivates the others.
In summary, Ron’s main strengths seem to be his bravery – he never shies away from dangerous or scary situations– and his loyalty – he sticks up for his mates and his family. Unfortunately, books 4 and 7 contain massive incidents of disloyalty, which almost cancel out this positive trait from the rest of the series. He is also known for being funny – Ron gets many of the humorous one-liners in the series.
On the negative side, his betrayal of Harry in book four and then Harry and Hermione in book seven stands out. He also has a mean streak and has much less of a conscience than the other two. Most of the admirable things Ron does are simply done alongside Harry, in the classic sidekick role, whereas Hermione has strengths in her own right.
A few more quotes from the internet, this time highlighting Ron’s appeal (unfortunately all from the Ron/Hermione POV, but it was all I could find):
“Ron admires Hermione's abilities, but has also seen her vulnerable, and has not rejected her. For a super achiever, this is a huge thing. His regard is unconditional, and that is also huge.”
“Hermione most likely intimidates most of her classmates, as well as the older kids. Now that they ARE the older kids, who is she to turn to? The faculty? Ron has shared good and bad with her. Despite their acrimony, she and Ron share many of the same values.”
“Another thing which occurs to me is that in the books, we really only see Ron and Hermione as they are viewed through the eyes of Harry Potter. We see Ron only as Harry sees Ron and only when Harry sees Ron. We don't see the moments that Hermione and Ron share together without Harry present. Harry sees Ron as his friend and as a bit of a goof, but he doesn't see him as a BOY the way an adolescent girl would see him. There must be aspects and sides of Ron which Harry never sees, conversations with Hermione which he never hears and attractive attributes which he never notices because he's a boy who likes girls and never looks at Ron "that way."”
“I don't think we should undersell Ron's loyalty. Loyalty is far more than a minor qualilty in the HP universe (for example, it is Harry's loyalty to Dumbledore that saves him in Chamber of Secrets). I think those who have already mentioned that Hermione is not as pretty as Emma Watson hit the nail on the head: Hermione is picked on mercilessly until the troll incident in PS (hell, even Ron says something like, "she's miserable--of course nobody likes her" before said run-in), and obviously she is gravely insulted by Malfoy and the like afterward. Ron is always there, and because his life is not screwed up like Harry's, he's there in a more complete sense. I think Hermione really appreciates that.”
Is it just me, or do these seem like clutching at straws? The best that people can say about Ron is that he’s ‘there’ and that he’s gone through good and bad with Hermione. Except of course, he’s not always ‘there’ (he abandons her and Harry), and much of the ‘bad’ that she’s been through was his fault (said abandonment, the Yule brawl, the Scabbers incident).
From the much-less-written-about Harry POV, as mentioned above, Ron just does what Harry does. He has very little going for him in his own right. One reason for Harry’s friendship with Ron could be that at the beginning of book one, both of them were alone and quite insecure, so they stuck together. They become familiar and share experiences, and these things breed friendship. But this is all I can come up with. This is probably enough, because boys are capable of being good mates based on a few memories and plenty of banter. Yes, Ron lets Harry down at times, but he always comes back and apologises (credit to him there) and at many other times he sticks by Harry.
His eventual relationship with Hermione is harder to fathom, for the reasons given in the first set of quotes above. It just makes no sense.
So, can anyone explain? I can just about deal with Harry’s friendship with Ron, but Hermione’s is simply unconvincing. He is mean to her, he abandons her, he argues with her – what does she see in him. Any
ideas?
Until recently I had never heard the term concept album. I don’t know why, I must have just never come
across it. Then I researched Coldplay’s
new album Mylo Xyloto on Wikipedia and found that the album was a concept
album. I found that a concept album is
an album that is ‘unified by a theme, which can be instrumental, compositional,
narrative, or lyrical’.
When it
comes to Mylo Xyloto, Coldplay have said that the album is about ‘two
protagonists, Mylo and Xyloto, who are living in an oppressive, dystopian urban
environment, meet one another through a gang called "The Lost Boys",
and fall in love’. This is
ridiculous. These characters are never
mentioned, and the lost boys only get a passing mention in one song. There is no significant mention of dystopia. The songs are generally about relationships,
that is true, but there is nothing within the songs themselves to suggest that
this is a story about two particular characters. If Coldplay had not explained what the album
is about, it would not have been labelled as a concept album. The only thing that can be said for Mylo
Xyloto as a concept album is that the songs could be argued to show the
progression of a (any, not a specific) relationship throughout the album – the first
few songs are about the past, then there are songs about meeting and falling in
love, then breakup and reconciliation songs.
There is a progression in the track order. But this is equally true of other
albums. As argued elsewhere, thoughtful
tracklisting is part of what makes a good album, and is not a particular mark
of one of these so-called ‘concept albums’.
In this system, all bidders will receive at least some tickets, and bidding for more tickets leads to proportionally more tickets gained.
Track seven, Where would we be, is a decent song, but perhaps more forgettable than the others. It is a song of gratitude that has a similar style to much of the alum – a big sound, a strong melody, it fluctuates between quieter piano/acoustic guitar-led sections before the drums and guitars explode it again. Solid, nothing wrong with it, but doesn’t have the zap that many of the other tracks do.